Creation is a faith, and Evolution is a faith (a religion). Neither of these can be proven by pure science. Both must be believed. Those who claim to be Creationists have the preconception that the Bible is the reliable record of the beginning of the universe. Those who call themselves Evolutionists have the preconception that the earth is billions of years old. These preconceptions are basic, but there are many others. A preconception is defined as “to form an opinion of something beforehand.” A preconception can be a deception which is defined as “the fact or state of being deceived.” To deceive an individual is to convince him that something is true when that something is not true. You may be deceived yourself. The thing you teach others may not be true. If what I believe is false, and I am deceived, how can I know it? If I ask myself this question, then there is hope that I may not be deceived, or that I may learn the truth. Is a person just as well off being deceived as he is knowing the truth, if he is happy and well-adjusted? Deception can never be good. Usually, people who are deceived are being exploited by someone or something. Some of what we believe may be false, but that in itself is not deception. All of us have wrong ideas about some things, but may or may not be adversely affected by those wrong ideas.
Where can I turn to learn if I am deceived? Shall I go to Wikepedia on the internet? I love Wikepedia and help support it, but I can’t rely completely on Wikepedia. Could I discover truth if I search school text books from kindergarten to university? All of these, in spite of their wealth of truth, are only the works of other men, and may contain their preconceptions. Should I turn to the most intellectual men who ever lived – Einstein or Newton? They are just men like me. I know that because they died. Should I look to the great philosophers like Socrates, Euclid, or Plato? If I read what they wrote, I’d have to read what somebody interpreted, so I’d have to trust the interpreter more than them. Help!
I, like all normal humans, was born with a natural preconception that a supreme being exists. This supreme being is not a human. I can rely on the truth of what I stated because every civilization in every age worshiped some sort of god: stone statues, fence posts, animals, you name it; men have worshiped it. The truth that all civilizations worshiped a divine being of some sort makes it reasonable to believe that the fool has said in his heart there is no God. Atheism is learned behavior, and can be unlearned. Darwin chose to be an Evolutionist because he could not bear the thought that if Christianity be true, my father, my grandfather, and almost all my friends are eternally lost, and this is a damnable doctrine.
Where do preconceptions come from? The growing-up environment of every child is different somehow. The human learns certain likes and dislikes. Some things make humans feel good about themselves and the world around them. All of us tend to move toward those things that make us feel the most secure and pleasant. All of our knowledge comes from outside ourselves – at least all of those things that matter most. Knowledge that comes to us is sorted out into piles labeled “I like” and “I don’t like.” At some point in life the thought of God occurs to us, and we place the thought in one pile or the other.
Somewhere along the line most of us decide to be Creationists or Evolutionists. This is a purely an arbitrary decision, based solely upon what makes us comfortable. There is the matter of the weight of evidence. The weight of evidence can never prove anything, but it can provide enough rationale to make a decision; however, poorly formed the decision may be. We are certain we have not been deceived, or have formed a preconceived idea. Since neither faith can be proven by empirical science, how can I know I have come down on the right side? Should I just go with the flow, and believe what most people believe, or is it possible that the few who believe the other way right? Oh, my! What a dilemma! And the though that I might have to live fore eternity with my decision doesn’t help me feel better. But if I come down on the side of Evolution, the thought of eternity is what I wanted to rid myself of.
Suppose the Geological Time Scale is wrong, or that pesky dinosaur blood cell is only a few thousand years old? After all, there is no real hard, test tube type proof that the Big Bang really happened. In fact, everything we know about Creationism and Evolution are only things we believe. Creationists will tell you right off that at the foundation we only believe. We can’t claim that anything is a fact. Charles Darwin and his disciples set out to prove Genesis wrong, and thereby destroy the Creationist’s faith in God, and for millions of people, he succeeded. Are Creationists deceived, or are Evolutionists deceived? Who is laboring under the worst preconception? Both can’t be right. Somebody has got to be deceived. And everybody said, “It ain’t me.”
Who has the better basis for what they believe. Repeat: There is no test tube evidence for either. We must rely on the weight of evidence – remember? Who contributes the most benefit to life in general: Creationists or Evolutionists? Somebody just stole a box of glassware off our carport. We live in a lower middle class neighborhood on a dead end street. People who live down the street regularly throw trash into our yard as they pass. There are members of our church who live down that street. While I suspect there are members of our church who would do things like that, I would think it would be more likely that people who believe we are just animals who do bad things like that. I don’t have money to do a study, or have access to a study to establish the truth of my belief, but I am sure there is more crime committed by people who don’t believe in Creation or God than there are who believe in Creation.
In the foreword of Dr. Duane Gish’s book, Creation Scientists Answer Their Critics (Available from ICR at www.icr.org/store or 800 628 7640), Dr. Henry M. Morris writes, “Since he joined ICR in 1971 he has participated in almost 300 debates, usually held on university campuses and opposing faculty evolutionary scientists, or – once in a while – an evolutionary philosopher or even an evolutionary theologian. And (at least in our judgment and that of most in the audiences) he always wins!
“… His opponents cannot produce scientific evidence for evolution for the simple reason that there isn’t any!”
To the evolutionist science is a dogma. A dogma is something that is right because it is declared to be right. For example, evolution declares that the earth is 4.54 years. This is based on radio metric dating. Radio metric dating is not reliable. Using Darwin’s example, I would say, “That is a damnable dogma.”
There is an outside, very remote possibility that I am deceived. I am astute enough to know that, and honest enough to admit it, but the penalty for deception I might have because of Creation could not be compared with the person who is deceived by Evolution, the religion of atheism. The Bible commands us to examine ourselves. This examination should be done objectively and deliberately. The tests of our faith must be tested by outside factors, not something we conjure up ourselves. The examination must be done by a non-committed individual of knowledge source. Weigh the evidence carefully.


